From: Sebastien Marie <semarie@kapouay.eu.org>
Subject: Re: security/mitmproxy: update to 11.0.1
To: "Kirill A. Korinsky" <kirill@korins.ky>, ports@openbsd.org, kn@openbsd.org
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 19:02:48 +0100

Kirill A. Korinsky <kirill@korins.ky> writes:

> Sebastien,
>
> what do you think about MODCARGO_CARGOLOCK?

ah, sorry to not responding more quickly, I looked at mitmproxy, see why
you needed it... and pass on it.

Globally, I still disklike it, but it resolves a real problem (due to
the way upstream package mitmproxy). So I am fine with it.

Regarding the documentation, I think it should mention that it do not
affect the build in any way : cargo is looking at MODCARGO_CARGOTOML
path only. Otherwise it could be confusing for the packager to have
both.

Maybe something like "used only by modcargo-gen-crates target" ?

Thanks.
-- 
Sebastien Marie