From: Stuart Henderson Subject: Re: nextcloud-30.0.10 -stable To: gonzalo , Rafael Sadowski , Landry Breuil , Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 11:24:33 +0100 The old text was This is an old major version of Nextcloud. Update to the newest available in packages before updating to the next OpenBSD release. See ${LOCALBASE}/share/doc/pkg-readmes/nextcloud for more information. -- Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. On 2 May 2025 11:15:58 gonzalo wrote: > On 5/1/25 2:12 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2025/05/01 13:48, Rafael Sadowski wrote: >>> On Thu May 01, 2025 at 01:07:04PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: >>>> Le Thu, May 01, 2025 at 11:58:58AM +0100, Stuart Henderson a écrit : >>>>> On 2025/04/30 21:01, Rafael Sadowski wrote: >>>>>> Tested on stable, for OPENBSD_7_7. OK? >>>>>> >>>>>> Index: Makefile >>>>>> =================================================================== >>>>>> RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/nextcloud/30/Makefile,v >>>>>> diff -u -p -r1.6 Makefile >>>>>> --- Makefile 20 Feb 2025 16:36:02 -0000 1.6 >>>>>> +++ Makefile 30 Apr 2025 19:00:15 -0000 >>>>>> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ >>>>>> -NC_VERSION= 30.0.5 >>>>>> +NC_VERSION= 30.0.10 >>>>> >>>>> ok >>>> >>>> just passing by, but since we have 31/ now, shouldnt 30 have the MESSAGE >>>> hinting at upgrading to 31 to keep the "only support the latest" motto ? >>> >>> But we have no nextcloud 31 in 7.7/stable. The message only makes sense >>> in -current!? >> >> The MESSAGE should be added to 30 in -current. >> >>>> that doesnt forbid upgrades ofc, but the hint is necessary to get >>>> everyone on 31 (or 32) by 7.8. >>>> >>>> Landry >>> >> > > So a MESSAGE on 30 -current with something like: > > "To ensure support, please update to the latest version" > > is ok?