From: Rafael Sadowski <rafael@sizeofvoid.org>
Subject: Re: New port: redict
To: Lydia Sobot <chilledfrogs@disroot.org>, Daniel Jakots <danj@chown.me>,  ports@openbsd.org
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 12:09:48 +0200

On Mon May 12, 2025 at 10:50:31AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2025/05/09 21:05, Lydia Sobot wrote:
> > > out of curiosity, why did you settle for this particular fork?
> > > it doesn't seem to be super active
> > > https://codeberg.org/redict/redict/commits/branch/main
> > No particular reason except that it seemed decently maintained to me
> > 
> > >> I used the UID/GID for Redis for Redict in users.list
> > >
> > > I guess this is fine since I doubt people will want to have both at the
> > > same time. Not sure if they should conflict.
> > Ok, but does that mean that Redict should run under the username _redis?
> 
> Should use a different uid.
> 
> Personally I'd go with valkey rather than redict, since they kept the
> original BSD license, and have quite widespread support/active
> development.
> 

I would also opt for valkey.