From: Marco van Hulten <marco@hulten.org>
Subject: Re: NEW: archivers/libaec
To: Martin Reindl <martin@catai.org>
Cc: ports@openbsd.org
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 16:02:05 +0200

On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 15:56:17 +0200 Martin Reindl wrote:
> > There are many more libraries linked than in your case.  How is it
> > possible that your cdo reads the *.grb file without it being linked to
> > hdf5?
> > 
> > I imagine that I should have done something to make cdo work with
> > netcdf-4.9.2 and that installing netcdf-4.9.3 was not strictly needed.
> > Is 'make clean' not enough for the ports system to relink to existing
> > libraries an forget about old ones?

I now did 'make clean in /usr/ports', and then 'make uninstall', 'make
clean=all' (getting also rid of the package tar files) and 'make
clean=depends' for libaec, hdf5, netcdf and cdo.

> > Apropos, for the updated netcdf, not all patches to the test files
> > worked, so I skipped the patching (and have not done a make test).  If
> > you want, I could check which patch files are still needed and need
> > adjustment, but please go ahead if you have the time.  
> 
> I only recompiled the old cdo 1.9.2 code already on my disk, I did not try a
> newer version. In the hdf5 diff the WANTLIB entries for aec+sz were missing,
> this is fixed now. The diff below also includes the update for
> netcdf 4.9.3 with libaec+sz enabled - you're right, some patches can be removed
> now.

I am trying to build and test libaec, hdf5, netcdf and cdo (in that
order) with your Wednesday patches applied.  When I make test hdf5, I
get an 

> error: no member named 'token' in 'union H5L_info1_t::(unnamed at /usr/local/include/H5Lpublic.h:1463:5)'

I attached the terminal output.

Marco