From: Rafael Sadowski <rafael@sizeofvoid.org>
Subject: Re: import databases/duckdb
To: Sebastien Marie <semarie@kapouay.eu.org>
Cc: Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org>, ports@openbsd.org,  dlg@openbsd.org
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 10:20:46 +0200

On Sun Jun 02, 2024 at 03:59:30PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Sebastien Marie <semarie@kapouay.eu.org> writes:
> > 
> > 3. split the port in several parts (maybe FLAVOR or separated ports):
> >    - main part : duckdb executable + library without extensions (or
> >      only minimal set)
> >    - extension part : build the extensions and install *.duckdb_extension
> >      files in a system directory
> 
> I started to explore build duckdb and extensions separately, but an
> additional problem popup: extensions are checked for a signature (from
> upstream key). So port build ones doesn't have signature and are, by
> default, refused to be loaded (user should set `allow_unsigned_extensions`
> flag to permit the load). From user point of vue, building extensions
> separately seems to be no go.
> 
> So I intent to build most extensions statically (in cli and shared
> library), and don't install static files.
> 
> Thanks.
> -- 
> Sebastien Marie
> 

Please find attached duckdb-1.3.2. I cleanup a little bit and
added do-test. I think there is no good solution for the
extensions.

Rafael