From: Pascal Stumpf Subject: Re: [new] CDE To: Theo Buehler Cc: Antoine Jacoutot , ports@openbsd.org Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 21:04:58 +0200 On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 20:52:13 +0200, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 08:43:45PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 20:38:09 +0200, Theo Buehler wrote: > > > In my ongoing bulk, eterm hit the conflict in devel/libast: > > > > Seems like I forgot this part of the puzzle. > > > > > Can't install libast-0.7p12 because of conflicts (ksh93-1.0.10p0v0) > > > > > > This works for me. > > > > > > Index: Makefile > > > =================================================================== > > > RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/libast/Makefile,v > > > diff -u -p -r1.28 Makefile > > > --- Makefile 21 Jul 2025 15:31:49 -0000 1.28 > > > +++ Makefile 30 Aug 2025 18:16:55 -0000 > > > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ COMMENT= library of assorted spiffy thi > > > > > > DISTNAME= libast-0.7 > > > PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME} > > > -REVISION = 12 > > > +REVISION = 13 > > > SHARED_LIBS += ast 3.0 # .2.1 > > > CATEGORIES= devel > > > > > > Index: pkg/PLIST > > > =================================================================== > > > RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/libast/pkg/PLIST,v > > > diff -u -p -r1.6 PLIST > > > --- pkg/PLIST 28 Feb 2023 10:13:04 -0000 1.6 > > > +++ pkg/PLIST 30 Aug 2025 18:24:07 -0000 > > > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > > > -@conflict ksh93-* > > > +@conflict ksh93-<1.0.10p0v0 > > > +@conflict ksh93-libshell-* > > > > This is supposed to be "@conflict libshell-*", no? > > I'm not sure. That's why I ask :) > > Per packages-specs(7) a conflict takes a pkgpath, which according to > pkgpath(7) is of the form 'some/directory[-sub][,flavor...]', so I > thought the ksh93 bit is needed. Hmm, no. Per pkg_create(1), a @conflict takes a pkgspec, which per packages-specs(7) consists of stem-version[-flavor], which in this case is "libshell-$V" aka PKGNAME. The pkgpath in this case would be shells/ksh93,-libshell. > > > bin/libast-config > > > include/libast/ > > > include/libast.h