From: Theo Buehler Subject: Re: graphics/ffmpeg: update to 8.0 To: rafael@sizeofvoid.org, ports@openbsd.org, andrey0bolkonsky@gmail.com, tobhe@openbsd.org, thfr@openbsd.org, uaa@openbsd.org, rsadowski@openbsd.org, pascal@stumpf.co, espie@openbsd.org, landry@openbsd.org, kn@openbsd.org, kirby@openbsd.org, jeremy@openbsd.org, brad@comstyle.com, noiseless-ak@yandex.ru Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 17:22:11 +0200 On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 04:19:52PM +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > On Sun, 19 Oct 2025 15:23:25 +0200, > Theo Buehler wrote: > > > > > I'd like to move on. Here the first diff which I would like to commit which > > > is attached as .gz because it is huge. > > > > > > This diff brings patches which are requries to pass bulk build against > > > ffmpeg8. > > > > > > I don't include update for ffmpeg8 or cleanup WANLIB and requried revbump. > > > Just patches. > > > > > > My bulk is running and should be done in a day. > > > > > > Ok to commit when it finished? > > > > Has any of this been tested on !amd64? > > > > As far as I know no. I did multiple bulk on amd64 with and without ffmepg8 > update. I almost sure that it survies the bulk, but it is large and I prefer > to run one more cycle before commit it. > > But changes is quite trivial, and I doubt that it may break anything. Thanks, sounds good to me. I'm indeed more concerned that the update itself is tested on a few architectures before it goes in.