From: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <jca@wxcvbn.org>
Subject: Re: extend ptrace(2) PT_GET_THREAD_* to include thread names
To: kurt@intricatesoftware.com
Cc: cjeker@diehard.n-r-g.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, pascal@stumpf.co, ports@openbsd.org, tech@openbsd.org
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 13:59:16 +0100

On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 07:14:25PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I got curious and looked at what it would take to support both the old
> > and new structure sizes, and the diff below appears to work fine.  The
> > issue is more of a problem on slower architectures where kernel and
> > packages can stay unsynchronized for a longer time.  Thoughts?
> 
> I really don't believe in that 'support model'.  The people using those
> machines build their own packages (or they don't, but that's not our
> problem).

Well I'm not really surprized.  As the maintainer of the devel/gdb
port I was just trying to make it easier for folks to debug and report
issues.

Anyway, I don't care that much and as I said Kurt's diff already has my ok.

Cheers,
-- 
jca