From: Rafael Sadowski <rafael@sizeofvoid.org>
Subject: Re: [wayland] seatd VT switching and device access for wlroots-based programs
To: Landry Breuil <landry@openbsd.org>
Cc: matthieu@openbsd.org, ports@openbsd.org, jca@openbsd.org
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 13:18:25 +0100

On Sat Jan 03, 2026 at 10:41:45AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> 
> i'm all for adding the _seatd group, you could reuse stalwart-jmap/564 which
> puts it next to _greetd, which seems 'logical'. end users shouldn't have to
> fiddle with that (and with the default _seatd group for the /var/run/seatd.sock
> socket), and we should find a way to put the _greetd user in the _seatd group
> automatically.
> 

I haven't done as many tests as Landry, but I vote for _seatd too.