From: Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org>
Subject: Re: [new] textproc/tree-sitter-cli 0.26.5
To: Edd Barrett <edd@theunixzoo.co.uk>
Cc: Laurent Cheylus <foxy@free.fr>, ports <ports@openbsd.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:55:47 +0000

On 2026/02/20 11:42, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 06:27:11PM +0100, Laurent Cheylus wrote:
> > I will try to run/fix tests for my textproc/tree-sitter-cli port.
> 
> Attached tarball fixes the tests.
> 
> They rely on test grammars not shipped in the source tarball. I've hosted a
> tarball containing the grammars and now the cli tests all pass.
> 
> Upstream confirms it's OK to use a CLI version newer than the tree-sitter
> library.
> 
> Did some tidy up while here.
> 
> OK anyone?
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards
> Edd Barrett
> 
> https://www.theunixzoo.co.uk


: V =             0.26.5
: ..
: GH_TAGNAME =    v${V}
: ..
: PKGNAME =       tree-sitter-cli-${GH_TAGNAME:S/v//}

just use ${V} here as well

: HOMEPAGE =      https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/blob/master/crates/cli/

there's not much on there relevant to the user, would it be better to
use https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/cli/ ? (the landing page
isn't brilliant, but it puts you in the right place on the frame to the
left for the various pages talking about the cli)