From: Volker Schlecht Subject: Re: lang/zig moved to Codeberg To: Brandon Mercer , ports@openbsd.org, semarie@openbsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 16:17:08 +0200 On 3/29/26 4:11 PM, Brandon Mercer wrote: > On Sat, Mar 28, 2026, at 6:15 PM, Volker Schlecht wrote: >> On 3/28/26 7:04 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> >>> it doesn't seem useful to have ZIG_VERSION and V as separate vars? >> >> Good point - update attached. > > Thanks for the updated diff. > >>> this one is so annoying, it seems like it should be simple to fix >>> so that dist-tuple.port.mk sets it correctly, but nothing I try works... >>> (all the ports using codeberg DIST_TUPLE explicitly set WRKDIST to what >>> you get from ${WRKDIR}/${_project}) > > I've tried playing around with this as well. I made zero progress. > >> Agreed, but honestly I'm glad there's no canonical way to deal with this >> (yet) that I missed :-) >> Attachments: >> * zig-codeberg2.diff > > This diff looks very similar to what I've been preparing for the 0.16.x release. Do we see a compelling reason to make the switch to codeberg before 0.16 hits or can we keep pulling from GH until then? > bmercer@ No strong opinion here, I just noticed while looking at the zig docs while working on a zig-based port and thought I'd throw it out there.