Download raw body.
(changed subject) Re: net/i2pd: FD talk and limits and ISP routers too weak maybe
(changed subject) Re: net/i2pd: FD talk and limits and ISP routers too weak maybe
(changed subject) Re: net/i2pd: FD talk and limits and ISP routers too weak maybe
beecdaddict@danwin1210.de wrote: > I know system shares all resources including FDs > as far as I know there's what kernel/OS needs and is using and the rest of > users including but not limited to staff and daemon users/programs like i2pd > all I was wondering is the limit or amount of FDs and other resources the rest > of users of daemon can use > in my head is a total amount which apparently is unknown (I have been told > why, but how can anyone work with that? it's like relying on someone mentally > unstable) which is then devided, kernel/OS gets all that it needs, users and > daemons get the rest which IS DIVIDED (in my head) until there is no more to > divide/give away/share > am I close? > > okay maybe not make all available resources to 1 program is not how it works > but why not if that's the only programs that's running? > I do not understand if it's even possible to do what I'm asking or > questioning, I am not a OS dev because of reasons, but I like discussing such > because I like OS-dev > > and just because what I ask isn't how it works doesn't mean it's bad? it could > mean You've been provided with all the source code. Where is your attempt to change things?
(changed subject) Re: net/i2pd: FD talk and limits and ISP routers too weak maybe
(changed subject) Re: net/i2pd: FD talk and limits and ISP routers too weak maybe
(changed subject) Re: net/i2pd: FD talk and limits and ISP routers too weak maybe