I'm out of here.

beecdaddict@danwin1210.de wrote:

> oh, Theo, if I were to start changing thing to the perfect OS security-wise,
> it wouldn't even look like OpenBSD code anymore, but OpenBSD still best what
> world have to offer
> 
> so do you agree with my logic? at least give me that
> at least tell me is this how things stand FD-wise/limit-wise/whatever, you
> probably know the best out of all I e-mailed with
> 
> no attempt yet,in future I hope,it's not a I am too lazy reason
> 
> On Tue, January 30, 2024 3:58 pm, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > beecdaddict@danwin1210.de wrote:
> >
> >> I know system shares all resources including FDs
> >> as far as I know there's what kernel/OS needs and is using and the rest of
> >> users including but not limited to staff and daemon users/programs like
> >> i2pd all I was wondering is the limit or amount of FDs and other resources
> >> the rest of users of daemon can use in my head is a total amount which
> >> apparently is unknown (I have been told why, but how can anyone work with
> >> that? it's like relying on someone mentally unstable) which is then devided,
> >> kernel/OS gets all that it needs, users and daemons get the rest which IS
> >> DIVIDED (in my head) until there is no more to
> >> divide/give away/share am I close?
> >>
> >> okay maybe not make all available resources to 1 program is not how it
> >> works but why not if that's the only programs that's running? I do not
> >> understand if it's even possible to do what I'm asking or questioning, I am
> >> not a OS dev because of reasons, but I like discussing such because I like
> >> OS-dev
> >>
> >>
> >> and just because what I ask isn't how it works doesn't mean it's bad? it
> >> could mean
> >
> > You've been provided with all the source code.
> >
> >
> > Where is your attempt to change things?
> >
> >
> >
> 
>