Index | Thread | Search

From:
Renaud Allard <renaud@allard.it>
Subject:
Re: [new] net/dnsq
To:
ports <ports@openbsd.org>
Cc:
Otto Moerbeek <otto@drijf.net>
Date:
Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:30:02 +0100

Download raw body.

Thread

On 2/20/24 09:17, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:09:49AM +0100, Renaud Allard wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On 2/19/24 16:50, Renaud Allard wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Here is a preliminary port for "q" which is a tiny and feature-rich
>>> command line DNS client with support for UDP, TCP, DoT, DoH, DoQ, and
>>> ODoH.
>>>
>>
>> Here is the port cleaned up. There is no man page (although you can get
>> usage with --help), so I included the readme.md in /usr/local/share/doc/q
>>
>> Any suggestions or OKs?
> 
> I occasiaonally use it, so a port is welcome. I do have one gripe: the
> name, it's way too short and thus non-descriptive. dnsq or anything
> more descriptive would be better.
> 

Yes, the name doesn't tell anything by itself.
Is this one better? The binary is still called q, but the package is dnsq.