Index | Thread | Search

From:
Theo Buehler <tb@theobuehler.org>
Subject:
Re: [UPDATE] devel/swig
To:
Stuart Cassoff <exokoide@yahoo.ca>
Cc:
OpenBSD Ports <ports@openbsd.org>
Date:
Wed, 11 Feb 2026 18:00:23 +0100

Download raw body.

Thread
  • Stuart Cassoff:

    [UPDATE] devel/swig

  • On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 11:45:40AM -0500, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
    > Here are the bumps I found with show-reverse-deps and the magic of 
    > recursion. Seems like a lot? No idea about the double-commas.
    
    As I wrote in my last mail, I think only the ports having a direct
    (explicit) BUILD_DEPENDS on devel/swig + the ports depending on
    py-scipy need a bump.
    
    My reasoning is: SWIG generates code, so if a port BDEPs on it, its code
    may change due to the update. py-scipy RDEPs on it, so I expect that
    things depending on py-scipy may change, so I'd bump them as well.
    
    This might not cover static links (which are rare), but I don't think it
    makes sense to bump all reverse deps.
    
    
  • Stuart Cassoff:

    [UPDATE] devel/swig