Index | Thread | Search

From:
Theo Buehler <tb@theobuehler.org>
Subject:
Re: [UPDATE] devel/swig
To:
Stuart Cassoff <exokoide@yahoo.ca>
Cc:
OpenBSD Ports <ports@openbsd.org>
Date:
Wed, 11 Feb 2026 18:35:04 +0100

Download raw body.

Thread
On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 12:21:40PM -0500, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2026, Theo Buehler wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 11:45:40AM -0500, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> > > Here are the bumps I found with show-reverse-deps and the magic of 
> > > recursion. Seems like a lot? No idea about the double-commas.
> > 
> > As I wrote in my last mail, I think only the ports having a direct
> > (explicit) BUILD_DEPENDS on devel/swig + the ports depending on
> > py-scipy need a bump.
> > 
> > My reasoning is: SWIG generates code, so if a port BDEPs on it, its code
> > may change due to the update. py-scipy RDEPs on it, so I expect that
> > things depending on py-scipy may change, so I'd bump them as well.
> > 
> > This might not cover static links (which are rare), but I don't think it
> > makes sense to bump all reverse deps.
> > 
> 
> Excellent, thanks.
> This is one part of porting where I'm not overly confident.

This list looks correct to me. u-boot and llvm need bumps in the
subdirectories, of course.

I think you can go ahead and land this.

ok tb