Index | Thread | Search

From:
Leah Rowe <info@minifree.org>
Subject:
Re: new port: LibreWolf Web browser
To:
Landry Breuil <landry@openbsd.org>, ports@openbsd.org
Date:
Sun, 19 Apr 2026 22:50:48 +0100

Download raw body.

Thread
Please disregard. I figured it out, by looking at several other ports. A 
new tarball follows, from my new "submit3" branch:

https://codeberg.org/vimuser/librewolf-openbsd-port/src/branch/submit3

this adds the following change, since my last tarball:

https://codeberg.org/vimuser/librewolf-openbsd-port/commit/33df15d2e3ae0d1b44b8c3cc1b1dc2da31f48c66

with this change, upstream version 149.0.2-2 becomes openbsd package: 
librewolf-149.0.2pl2

i can see that the previous "extra dot" scheme that i implemented was 
likely ok, but i prefer pl (patch level). this just feels more natural, 
within the ports system.

here is the new tarball, attached.


Am 19.04.26 um 21:40 schrieb Leah Rowe:
>
> Am 19.04.26 um 19:46 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
>> Exactly, and we have to bump REVISION for various purposes.
>>
>> Either the extra dot scheme, or use 'pl' which is perfect for this (used
>> in other ports in the same situation, and handled by pkg_add).
>
> Can you show me an example of this?
>
> I switched to the extra dot scheme already, but the other thing you 
> mention sounds interesting.
>
-- 
Company director, Minifree Ltd
Registered in England, No. 9361826 | VAT No. GB202190462
Registered Office: 19 Hilton Road, Canvey Island, Essex SS8 9QA, UK